Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

5±Þ¿Íµ¿ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¼öº¹¿¡¼­ ÃæÀü¹æ¹ýÀÌ º¯¿¬´©Ãâ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ ½ÇÇèÀû ¿¬±¸

In Vitro Study On Effect Of Insertion Methods on Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Resins

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1987³â 14±Ç 1È£ p.51 ~ 64
ÀÌ»óÈ£, ¼ÕÈï±Ô,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ»óÈ£ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ÀçÈ°Çаú
¼ÕÈï±Ô (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á ·Ð
ÀúÀÚ´Â ¹ß°ÅµÈ ¼Ò±¸Ä¡ 120°³ÀÇ Ä¡°æºÎ¿¡ 5¿Íµ¿À» Çü¼ºÇÏ°í 2Á¾·ùÀÇ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ¸·Î 4°¡Áö Ãæ
Àü¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÃæÀüÇÏ°í, °¢°¢ ±³ÇÕº¯¿¬ºÎ¿Í Ä¡Àºº¯¿¬ºÎ¿¡¼­ º¯¿¬´©Ãâ Á¤µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ´Ù
À½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ±³ÇÕº¯¿¬ºÎ¿¡¼­ SiluxR±º°ú Alpha-dentR±º °øÈ÷ ÃæÀü¹æ¹ý
¿¡ µû¸¥ º¯¿¬´©Ãâ Á¤µµÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
2. Ä¡Àºº¯¿¬ºÎ¿¡¼­ SiluxR±ºÀº ¿©·¯¹ø ³ª´©¾î ÃæÀüÇÑ ±ºµéÀÌ Çѹø¿¡ ÃæÀüÇÑ
±ºµé¿¡ ºñÇØ º¯¿¬´©ÃâÀÌ Àû¾úÀ¸¸ç Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(P<0.05)
3. Ä¡Àºº¯¿¬ºÎ¿¡¼­ Alpha-dentR±ºÀº matrix¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ °¡¾ÐÇÑ ±ºµéÀÌ
matrix¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº ºñ°¡¾Ð ±ºµé¿¡ ºñÇØ º¯¿¬´©ÃâÀÌ Àû¾úÀ¸¸ç Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ÀÖ¾ú
´Ù(P<0.05)
4. ÃæÀü¹æ¹ý¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ SliuxR±º°ú AlphadentR±º¿¡¼­ ±³ÇÕ
º¯¿¬ºÎ°¡ Ä¡Àºº¯¿¬ºÎ º¸´Ù º¯¿¬´©ÃâÀÌ Àû¾úÀ¸¸ç Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(P<0.05)
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal leakage of class V composite
resin restorations by the changing insertion method. The cavities were frilled with two
composite resin systems in accordance with following four insertion methods, first,
incremental with pressure, second, incremental without pressure, third, single incremental
with pressure, and fourth single in cremental without pressure. The composite resin
systems used in this study were SiluxRscotchbondR (3M
Co.) which were light curred, and Alpha-dentR Enamel
BondR which were chemically cured. All procedures were directed by
manufacturers' recommendations. All specimens were thermocycled by alternatly
immersing them in water at 4¡É and 60¡É for 100 cycles. They were immersed in 0.5%
Methylene Blue solution for 24 hours, and sectioned buccolingually through the
restorations with diamond disk into two parts. The sectioned specimens were observed
with light microscopy.
The following results were obtained.
1. No significant difference in the degree of marginal leakage was observed among
insertion methods in SiluxR groupsR at the occlusal margins.
2. At gingival margins in SiluxR groups, incremental subgroups chow
less marginal leakege com-pared with single incremental subgroups and show significant
difference between them.(P<0.05)
3. At gingival margins in Alpha-dentR Groups, pressure subgroups show
less marginal leakage compared with non-pressure subgroups and show significant
difference between them.(p<0.05)
4. At occlusal margins, SiluxR and Alpha-dentR Groups
show less marginal leakage compared with gingival margins in all insertion methods and
show significant difference between them.(p<0.05)

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI